# World simulation software for multi-stakeholder scenarios

## The problem

A decision can depend on how stakeholders respond to one another over time. A static list of independent opinions can miss interaction, feedback and changing positions.

Explore how a defined set of actors may respond to a change across several rounds. Use world simulation to compare plausible scenario paths and identify assumptions to monitor; it does not forecast what will happen.

## Relevant capabilities

- Multi-actor scenarios with bounded rounds
- World types include public reaction, stakeholder interaction, market scenario, policy scenario and custom world
- Simulated Twitter or Reddit environments can represent interactions

## How to compare

- Which change or decision is being explored?
- Which actors, goals, source material and starting positions should be represented?
- What real-world signals would show that a scenario assumption is becoming more or less plausible?

## Bring these inputs

- A specific change, decision and starting conditions
- Relevant evidence, actor roles and interests
- A small set of assumptions and real-world indicators to monitor

## A practical first workflow

- Define the scenario, decision question, actors and source material.
- Choose the world type and set the rounds and interaction rules.
- Compare the resulting paths, record assumptions and identify real signals to monitor before acting.

## Check before expanding

- Check every actor role, goal, starting condition and source against the brief.
- Treat each trajectory as one simulated path under stated assumptions, not a forecast.
- Compare useful hypotheses with real evidence as events unfold.

## Proof to inspect

Explore the world-simulation sample report, including its round-by-round output and limitations. It is a sample run, not a measured market outcome.

## Economics
The current World Simulation options allow up to 20 rounds. This is a tool limit, not a free allowance or a promise of account entitlement. Confirm access and any study charges before running a scenario.

## Limitations
Actors and trajectories are simulated. A plausible path is not a probability, statistical finding, forecast or observed stakeholder response. Results depend on the assumptions and source material supplied.

## Before switching

A simulation explores a path implied by its setup. It does not replace market monitoring, interviews, surveys, operational data or contingency planning.

## Frequently asked questions

### Does a world simulation predict what will happen?

No. It produces plausible paths under specified assumptions. Compare its hypotheses with real signals and evidence.

### How is this different from a synthetic persona panel?

A persona panel explores responses from defined personas. A world simulation models actors interacting over rounds so positions and events can evolve.

### How many rounds can a scenario use?

The current options permit up to 20 rounds. That limit does not mean a study is free or included in every account.

## Get started

### Start with a clear research plan

Download a free planning checklist, then get started with PulseLake when you are ready. The checklist does not include a free study.

[Get started with PulseLake](https://www.pulselake.co/get-started?intent=world-simulation&offer_id=starter-checklist-v1&utm_source=pulselake&utm_medium=owned&utm_campaign=signup-journey&utm_content=landing_hero) · [Download your free checklist](/solutions/world-simulation.txt)

The checklist is free and needs no account. Study software, participant costs and any agreed services are separate.

We make PulseLake. If a method or limit has changed, contact hello@pulselake.co so we can correct this page.

## Sources
- https://www.pulselake.co/answers/how-to-understand-market-needs-before-fieldwork
- https://www.pulselake.co/terms

[Get started with PulseLake](https://www.pulselake.co/get-started)